Historical breakdown of pink and blue from @gsnwilliams

The creator explains the history of how the colors pink and blue became gendered. He starts by posing the surprising fact that pink was once for boys and blue for girls, then chronologically details how in the 18th century pink was a masculine color, how the conversation shifted to children's clothing in the early 20th century, the role of post-WWII advertising in solidifying the modern gender-color association, the feminist movement's push for unisex clothing, and finally how the advent of ultrasound technology in the 1980s cemented the color-coding for marketing purposes.

Creator: @gsnwilliams on Instagram

Video format

Greenscreen Talking Head

Video outline

  1. Challenge a common belief
  2. Unfold the historical reversal
  3. Expose the commercial motive
  4. State the powerful conclusion

Narrative framework

The Historical Reversal

Narrative framework logic

To deconstruct a widely-held modern belief by tracing its surprising and often commercially-driven historical evolution, making the viewer feel like they've discovered a secret.

Topics: Fashion, Cultural History, History, Marketing

Concepts: Strange but True, Breakdown

Formats: Greenscreen Talking Head

Elements: B-Roll Cutaway, Archival Footage, Follow / Subscribe CTA, Jump Cut, Green Screen Composite, Image Overlay, Voiceover, Text Overlay

Account types: Personal Brand

Transcript excerpt

You believe me if I told you that pink used to be for boys and blue was for girls? This is Fashion is Genderless. A series about how the things that we consider masculine or feminine constantly change. Back in the eighteenth century, wealthy European men wore pink because colored fabrics were expensive to produce. With many dyes being imported from overseas. Pink was also considered a lighter shade of red, a color that was associated with military strength and power. But a century better, the conversation had shifted to children's clothing. In 1918, a children's clothing publication recommended pink for boys because it was considered the stronger color, while blue was apparently more delicate and better suited to girls. The problem was that nobody could actually agree. Nine years later, Time Magazine surveyed major American department stores and found that they still couldn't agree. However, over the following two decades, American clothing manufacturers began settling on pink for girls and blue for boys. And I find that timing very interesting. After World War two, advertising was pushing the image of the perfect housewife, encouraging women to return to a domestic life after taki

To transcribe a public Instagram Reel, use the Instagram transcript generator on Content Tools, our sister app.

237,124 views